Several thousand anti-abortion protesters marched in Washington yesterday on the 41st anniversary of Roe vs. Wade—just a small manifestation of the attack on abortion rights taking place across the country these days.  I have no doubt that abortion rights will one day be secured in the United States: we are an increasingly secular country and demographic trends will eventually diminish the religious and political right that provide the motor force behind the anti-abortion drive.   But that’s the future.  Right now, abortion rights are imperiled, and lots of people will suffer.

I’m an unqualified supporter of abortion rights.  I’ll explain shortly why I think restrictions on abortion are immoral, but first I want to take the opportunity to vent a couple of my longstanding beefs with the pro-choice movement.

First, I have always thought that abortion rights supporters may have made a strategic mistake in focusing almost exclusively on women as the victims of the anti-abortion agenda.  Women of course are the direct victims, but it’s not as if men are unaffected.  If my girlfriend or wife has an unwanted pregnancy, I have an interest in her right to terminate it.  If she can’t, I’m a victim too, if I have any sense of responsibility as her sexual partner.  So, I’ve always thought that choice should be framed not just as a feminist issue, but as a family planning issue.  That might have rendered it less vulnerable to misogynist-inspired attacks.  The counterargument, I suppose, could be that in framing abortion as a feminist issue, pro-choicers have been able to mobilize their mainly female constituency more intensely and thus to greater effectiveness.  I don’t know if the strategic issue was ever actually discussed in those terms within the abortion rights movement.  I would be surprised if it was.

My second beef is that abortion rights supporters never directly confront the central contention of the anti-abortion (I never use “pro-life” except occasionally in quotation marks) movement: that abortion kills babies.  I understand the reticence.  To talk realistically about the nature of the fetus, to explain how far it is from having the essential characteristics of an actual, living, conscious human being, is difficult; it is vulnerable to demagogic caricature and emotionalist attack.  So, pro-choicers consistently change the subject: instead of talking about the fetus, they talk about the woman and her right to choose.  But that is an evasion.  I’d feel more comfortable if someone among the many smart people in the abortion rights movement could find an effective way to get across the kind of argument that I have already made and will reiterate in the following paragraphs.

A fetus is not a person—i.e., a human being entitled to the legal protection and moral regard we normally extend to persons.  It’s not a person because it possesses none of the attributes that we associate with persons–it lacks not only intelligence, but even consciousness.  In fact, until well into the second trimester–long after most abortions are performed–it isn’t even a sentient being in even the most primitive sense.  That means that it literally has no feelings.  And by “feelings” I don’t mean just mean emotions–obviously, a fetus has none–but physical sensation.  You simply cannot inflict pain–physical or emotional–on a fetus until well into the second trimester.  Even then, it is at best highly problematic to talk of “pain” in a being which, inarguably, lacks anything that can be called consciousness.

A fetus is less like a person than is a typical household pet, which does have some kind of consciousness if not intelligence, interacts with other animals including humans, and can certainly feel pain.  It is less like a person than are animals that we routinely kill for food.  The only thing a fetus has in common with you and me is a complete set of human chromosomes.  (Of course, you may believe that a fetus is like you and me in that it has a soul; but that is a religious belief, which you have no right to impose on anyone in a society that values religious freedom.)  It has the potential to eventually be like you and me, but potential is not actual, and there is no reason that mere potentiality should be protected and accorded “rights.”  That is, unless you believe that there is a moral imperative that every possibility for increasing the number of human beings on this earth must be preserved.

A woman–unlike a fetus–is an intelligent, conscious, sentient being.  Unlike a fetus, she is aware of her existence, she has desires and can feel pain.  It follows that it is morally perverse–not to mention absurd–to claim that a fetus has rights that trump the right of a woman to control her own body for a period of 9 months and to choose how she wishes to live her life.   Compulsory pregnancy is immoral.



  1. Jeffrey Herrmann January 24, 2014 at 6:01 pm

    Inspired by the charade being played out in Texas where an irreversibly brain dead pregnant woman is being kept on a ventilator in order to provide nutrients and oxygen to a fetus, I can imagine an alternative universe in which a born “fetus” would be endowed with the right to compel a woman to be surgically joined to it for a few months to provide sustenance via shared circulating blood, etc., because the life of a born “fetus” is precious.
    If the fetus’ right to life within the womb trumps the mother’s interest in not being an involuntary incubator, why wouldn’t a “fetus” outside the womb likewise have rights that compel the hijacking of a woman’s body?
    It’s a slippery slope, you know. Once you give the little buggers any right to hijack women’s bodies, there is no principled argument to end the right merely due to the occurrence of a birth.

  2. Anonymous February 21, 2014 at 6:30 am

    Very great post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wished to say that I have really enjoyed browsing your blog posts. In any case I’ll be subscribing in your feed and I am hoping you write once more very soon!

    • tonygreco February 21, 2014 at 10:04 pm

      Thanks much–I appreciate your comments.

  3. Anonymous February 24, 2014 at 9:55 pm

    Wonderful submit, very informative. I ponder why the opposite specialists of this sector don’t realize this. You must continue your writing. I’m sure, you have a huge readers’ base already!|What’s Taking place i’m new to this, I stumbled upon this I’ve discovered It absolutely useful and it has helped me out loads. I hope to give a contribution & assist different customers like its helped me. Good job.

    • tonygreco February 25, 2014 at 10:06 am


  4. Pingback: Talking About Abortion | |

  5. Pingback: Shouting About Abortion | |

Have a comment?

Required fields are marked (*)