The idea of socialism is undergoing something of a revival in the United States today.  In a Galllup poll last year, 57% of Democrats reported that they had a favorable view of socialism, compared to just 47% with a favorable view of capitalism.  Eight years ago Democrats were split 53/53 in their preferences between the two isms. Though the question wasn’t asked, I’m sure that 40 years ago capitalism would have been favored overwhelmingly.  The country’s leading socialist organization, Democratic Socialists of America, now has over 50,000 mostly youngish members, up from just 6,500 in 2012.  Symptomatic of the times, The New Republic has devoted more than half of its current issue to “The Socialist Moment.”

The socialist revival undoubtedly owes much to Bernie Sanders’s surprisingly strong run for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2016.  It got a further boost from the even more surprising election to Congress of the avowed socialist (and DSA member) Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in 2018.  From a more fundamental and long-term perspective, the socialist revival surely reflects an increasing disenchantment with actually existing capitalism, a sense on the part of many of our citizens, especially younger ones, that they aren’t getting their fair share of the benefits of an increasingly unequal society.

Dozens of DSA-endorsed candidates were elected to state and local offices around the country in 2018. Other dozens were defeated, but it looks like the Democratic Party could be acquiring a small but consistent socialist wing.  You don’t have to be a socialist to see this as a positive development.  American society today has reached levels of economic inequality and corporate concentration not seen since the early 20th century.  Our capitalism does need drastic reform, and that will come only with the election to pubic office, especially at the national level, of Democrats who are willing to engage with socialist (or socialistic) ideas. Socialists will never dominate the Democratic Party–they’ll never come close–but more power to them!

Of course, Republicans will do their best to use socialism as a scare word: Trump has already signaled his intentions with his warning/assurance that America will never be a socialist country, as if Democrats would put us on the road to Venezuela. I don’t think Democrats need to be intimidated.  They have the credible and true rejoinder that Republicans have always assailed major advances in public policy—including, notably, Social Security and Medicare—as “socialist.” I think that Republicans probably only helped the cause of socialism by constantly accusing Obama of socialist (or Marxist, or communist) tendencies.

But if socialism isn’t the scare word that it used to be, neither is it the wildly popular rallying cry that its partisans would like it to become.  Another recent Gallup poll reported that only 47% of Americans said they would be willing to vote for a socialist for president.  That compares to 96% who say they would willingly vote for a black, 76% for a gay, and 66% for a Muslim.  Even godless atheists, at 60%, enjoy a higher approval level than socialists. These numbers, I think, should be sufficient to discourage Bernie Sanders fans.  Sanders’s policy positions aren’t socialist in the old sense of advocating public ownership of the means of production. (Maybe that’s what he has in the back of his mind, but that’s not his public stance.) Sanders could advocate for the same policy agenda without calling himself a socialist, but his embrace of that label constitutes a critical political weakness.  A ceiling of 47% public support is not a promising basis for a campaign for the presidency. Which brings me back to my current favorite Democratic candidate, Elizabeth Warren. Warren is hardly less radical than Sanders, but she shamelessly calls herself a capitalist.  I think that’s the way to go.



  1. Donald Campbell June 3, 2019 at 6:20 pm

    I don’t think the term socialist, as we use it, has been adequately defined. I see contemporary politics on a continuum with the extremes being capitalism and communism. On a more basic level: the rights of the individual versus the rights of the group.

    I see socialism as a mixture of the two. Social security and Medicare are the two most successful socialist programs is US history. After the depression of the 1930’s, with socialists and communists having strength in America, these programs and other programs,laws and rules were legislated and/or written.

    The public sector and essentially the concept of government itself are socialist. The private sector, including private property and corporations are capitalistic.

    The questions we need to answer is how much of the economy do we want in the public sector? And how do we insure that the institutions in the public sector actually act in the public interest?

    • tonygreco June 3, 2019 at 7:27 pm

      I agree. The meaning of the term “socialist” has become very elastic. Often (or rather, usually) it’s left undefined, and it means different things to different people.

  2. Peter Sepulveda June 3, 2019 at 8:47 pm

    The 47% is immutable? I wonder what it was in the 1950’s?

    • tonygreco June 3, 2019 at 9:14 pm

      I wouldn’t suggest it’s immutable, but I wouldn’t expect it to change drastically very soon. Undoubtedly, if the question had been asked, the % would have been far, far lower in the 50s.

  3. Jeffrey Herrmann June 4, 2019 at 1:23 am

    Much depends on what you mean by “capitalism” and “socialism”.
    Ask Americans about “small business”, “entrepreneurs” or “free enterprise” and you get 79%-92% approval, according to Gallup. By “capitalism” they seem to understand something closer to “big business,” which understandably earns much lower approval today.
    AOC said in a recent interview: “What we have in mind and what my policies most closely resemble are what we see in the UK, in Norway, in Finland, in Sweden.”
    Hello? Sweden, the country ranked 19th (out of 186) in the conservative Heritage Foundation’s economic freedom rankings?
    What Sweden and many other European countries have are extensive social welfare safety nets. I suspect that is what gives “socialism” its current higher approval ratings.

    • tonygreco June 4, 2019 at 11:28 am

      I have long held that those periodic polls asking people whether they consider themselves liberal or conservative need to be taken with a grain of salt, since so many people have a poor understanding of what those categories really mean. The same can be said, even more emphatically, for socialist and capitalist.

Have a comment?

Required fields are marked (*)