So, Putin has decided that the threat was not enough; he is executing the threat.  I was wrong.  I thought that at most Putin would be content to move into the Donbas, to set up a pile of bargaining chips for negotiation with the West.  Instead, he has launched a full-scale attack on Ukraine. I have argued repeatedly over the years that the West, and particularly the US, bears a heavy responsibility for provoking Russian revanchism.  I have no reason to retract any of that.  But my skepticism over US alarmism during the current crisis was clearly misplaced.  The Biden administration’s warnings that Moscow was preparing an invasion were accurate.

Whatever the crimes and misdemeanors of US foreign policy, nothing remotely justifies Russia’s brutal and reckless act of aggression. Brutal because civilians will suffer and die—already, Ukrainians are crowding into subway stations to avoid Russian bombs.  Reckless because the dangers of escalation are considerable.  Michael Klare sketches a worst-case scenario that is scarily plausible:

…[American] generals are making plans for US combatants to assist Ukrainian soldiers in guerrilla operations against Russian invaders and to resupply Ukrainian forces from bases in adjoining NATO countries—moves that could easily result in American casualties and/or provoke Russian attacks on US/NATO staging areas, resulting in an escalating cycle of reprisals and counterattacks until American forces are engaged in a full-scale war with Russia.”

It’s hard to see what the US can do right now other than what the administration is doing—preparing sanctions that will hurt everybody.  Calls for a return to diplomacy from the peacenik left now ring hollow—Putin has essentially said that it’s too late for diplomacy, not only by invading, but by officially recognizing the independence of the breakaway Donbas regions.  You can withdraw troops; you can’t as easily withdraw recognition.

I still think that this crisis might have been avoided had the US made a good faith attempt to accommodate Putin’s legitimate grievances. Thirty years of the arrogance of American power helped create a dangerous menace in Vladimir Putin, but that doesn’t make him any the less dangerous.  We have to deal with the Putin that we have; there’s no easy way to go back.

 

3 comments

  1. Marcia February 24, 2022 at 2:35 pm

    The echoes of WWII are growing stronger….Sudetenland, followed by Poland, etc. Of course there are distinctions but one feels that the lack of will of the democracies is something that Putin is counting on while he takes as much land as he can. One can argue that he might stop once he has a buffer zone but it is not clear that it is really his objective.

  2. Elliot Linzer February 24, 2022 at 2:52 pm

    It is unusual to see almost the entire political spectrum in the US unified in their opposition to Putin and the Russian invasion of the Ukraine, with only one exception: Donald Trump and his followers. Are we going to see the Republican Party split down the middle on this in the next few days?

  3. Donald Campbell February 25, 2022 at 6:46 pm

    I see parallels to the invasion of Iraq in 2003. There was faked intelligence used as a pretext for the invasion and the indiscriminate use overwhelming force. Given the vast natural resources in Russia and the general division of the west it seems Putin calculated he could invade without serious repercussions.

    Bush was wrong in 2003 and Putin is wrong in 2022. War only makes more problems than it solves. Another war of choice by a super-power who is accountable to no one. It is very dismaying to see the failure of governments to act in ways that benefit humanity. With all the threats we are facing the actions of the world powers and their failure to address the truly important issues of our time seems an indictment of the concept of government inself.

Have a comment?

Required fields are marked (*)

TOP