The front page of Monday’s NY Times featured a story that was both distressing and infuriating.  It told of the travails of Andrea Kane, the supervisor of schools in Queen Anne’s County Md., who tried to raise with the parents in her district the subject of racism in their community.  Dr. Kane, a black woman, met with a flood of protests, some explicitly racist, that drove her from her job.  Her experience is symptomatic of a wave of resistance to the reinvigorated drive for racial justice that was catalyzed by the George Floyd killing. Much of that resistance has swirled around the alleged influence of something called “critical race theory” in American life, particularly in our schools.

To understand the clamor over critical race theory, it helps to recall how George H.W. Bush’s campaign manager, the late Lee Atwater, explained the evolution of dog whistling to white grievance:

You start out in 1954 by saying, Nigger, Nigger, Nigger.  By 1968 you can’t say Nigger, that hurts you, backfires.  So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff…”

The latest iteration of “all that stuff” is critical race theory.  The furor over the noxious influence of CRT is nothing more and nothing less than another contrivance by the right to inflame and exploit the racial fears and resentments of white America. “Those people”—blacks and their white enablers—are teaching our children to hate America and hate themselves because they’re white!  Don’t let them!

The reality is that CRT is an intellectual framework developed mainly by legal scholars for analyzing the continuing consequential presence of racism in American institutions, particularly in our laws. CRT is found in academic journals and scholarly books, not in public school curricula. But that doesn’t matter: the controversy over critical race theory isn’t actually about critical race theory. For the right-wing propaganda machine, “critical race theory” is a wonderfully useful scare phrase, a catchall to demonize practically all efforts to raise awareness of the legacy and continuing reality of racism in America. Right-wingers are generally loath to acknowledge that white racism remains a serious problem in our country.  That’s understandable: most of them are part of the problem, either because they are themselves racist or because they choose to pander to a racist base. So, deny the problem exists and find a scary catchphrase to discredit efforts to address it.  At the same time, use the alleged presence of CRT in the schools and other institutions as one more pretext in the culture wars that the right tirelessly wages.

Until a couple of years ago hardly anyone had heard of critical race theory outside of a relatively small school of academics.  Credit for the invention of the CRT controversy goes to Christopher Rufo, an associate of the right-wing Manhattan Institute. But it was Fox News that made Rufo a star. Soon after the George Floyd protests reached their height in the summer of 2020, Fox began airing segments featuring Rufo, who claimed that a pernicious new “cultural revolution” was being carried out through corporate HR, government diversity trainings, and public school curriculums. Rufo’s appearance on the Tucker Carlson show on September 2 made an impression on Carlson fan Donald Trump.  The result was an executive order restricting implicit bias and diversity training in federal government agencies. (The order was rescinded by Biden.)

Since then, Fox has relentlessly promoted CRT hysteria, with considerable success. At least 10 states have passed laws restricting the ways race can be taught in the public schools.  School board meetings across the country have seen acrimonious public hearings with emotional pleas from parents to protect their children from CRT.  And conscientious educators have been harassed or, like Kane, pushed out of their jobs. It’s to be seen how much staying power CRT has as a weapon in the right-wing arsenal. Most of us have probably forgotten the ludicrous campaign, 10 or 12 or so years ago, to whip up fears over Sharia law coming to these United States. Unfortunately, I’m afraid CRT will be a more resilient bogeyman than Sharia law.

 

 

7 comments

  1. Jeffrey Herrmann October 13, 2021 at 3:28 pm

    I suspect right-wing parents don’t fear that their kids will learn to hate themselves so much as they fear their kids will learn to hate their racist parents.

  2. Lois Bernard October 13, 2021 at 3:36 pm

    As a therapist I see children as young as 11 caught in this maelstrom. A child is already caught in the middle but now one non-custodial parent can demand that CRT NOT be taught to their child while the other parents has already taught tolerance and the actual history of the US to the child. How does a child manage to navigate this territory? Especially if their is the threat of court and the county is red. Like many in my state, North Carolina, where there are islands of blue but even the judges, according to my client’s mother, are anti-maskers who think that prayer protects from covid-19.

  3. John October 13, 2021 at 5:21 pm

    Valuable post. I’ve circulated it on my end. Thanks.

  4. Daniel Greco October 14, 2021 at 10:33 am

    That’s a really upsetting piece. I’m sure there are a lot of schools where any discussion of race and racism–as ongoing issues, rather than problems solved in the 60s–will trigger the kind of blowback Kane faced.

    But I think it’s a mistake to conclude that all critical discussion of “critical race theory” (scare quotes on purpose) is nothing more than dog-whistled racism. Have a look at this piece by a teacher at Grace Church School, a private high school in Manhattan:

    https://bariweiss.substack.com/p/i-refuse-to-stand-by-while-my-students

    The environment he describes there seems to me something one can legitimately object to on non-racist grounds. I’m sure he’s got an axe to grind, and other people at the school would probably paint a different picture. But I’ve heard enough similar anecdotes–mostly about other elite private schools–that I think blanket dismissal is the wrong reaction.

  5. tonygreco October 14, 2021 at 11:33 am

    The link you provide does indeed tell an upsetting, scary story of oppressive “anti-racist” extremism, and I’m sure that other similar examples exist. They should be criticized vigorously, both on their (de)merits and because they provide fodder for the right. But note that the approach taken by Grace Church has little to do with critical race theory properly understood. CRT doesn’t try to get into people’s heads. It’s not much occupied with personal prejudice but rather with laws, institutions and structures in which racism continues to operate.

  6. Daniel Greco October 14, 2021 at 11:50 am

    Yes. The environment and pedagogy Rossi describes seems to me to owe much more to the ideas of Robin DiAngelo than those of people like Kimberle Crenshaw, Richard Delgado, and Derrick Bell. So “critical race theory” isn’t an ideal name for it (hence the scare quotes).

    And I think the reasons Rufo and fellow travelers settled on the term are largely cynical; it sounds esoteric, and capitalizes on conservative distrust of academia.

    • tonygreco October 14, 2021 at 1:20 pm

      I agree completely.

Have a comment?

Required fields are marked (*)

TOP